[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: x86_32 yum $basearch



On Friday 20 February 2009 03:49:57 pm Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Dennis Gilmore <dennis ausil us> said:
> > Considering we already agreed to do it i thin we should assume we are
> > unless we have reason not to.  this time all we have done is make the
> > rpms reflect what has been the case for awhile.  Anyone who wants to
> > continue i586 support post F11 i look forward to talking to about setting
> > up i586 as a secondary arch.
>
> Is it really worth it to do a mass rebuild for F11 to go to i586, then
> turn around in a few months and do the same thing again for i686?
>
> If i686 is worth it, why not go to i686 today?  If it isn't worth it
> today, what is going to make it worth it in less than 6 months?
Its too late in the release cycle to drop support for an arch.  however we 
wont have to do a rebuild of everything for i686  it can happen over the 
development lifecycle for F-12. 

Dennis


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]