[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: x86_32 yum $basearch



Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> Considering we already agreed to do it i thin we should assume we are unless 
> we have reason not to.  this time all we have done is make the rpms reflect 
> what has been the case for awhile.  Anyone who wants to continue i586 support 
> post F11 i look forward to talking to about setting up i586 as a secondary 
> arch.
> 

nitpick: I think we've been i486+ for quite a while rather than i586+.

-Toshio

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]