[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: x86_32 yum $basearch



On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 16:58 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > Considering we already agreed to do it i thin we should assume we are unless 
> > we have reason not to.  this time all we have done is make the rpms reflect 
> > what has been the case for awhile.  Anyone who wants to continue i586 support 
> > post F11 i look forward to talking to about setting up i586 as a secondary 
> > arch.
> > 
> 
> nitpick: I think we've been i486+ for quite a while rather than i586+.

We haven't had an i486 kernel in a /long/ time.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- FreedomĀ² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]