Re: Referring to rpmfusion on Fedora project wiki?

[Adam Williamson <awilliam redhat com>]

On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 11:13 -0900, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Adam Williamson <awilliam redhat com> wrote:
> > Well, presumably the same logic would apply to wl, then, as it's a
> > kernel module containing non-free code. So either way, we would appear
> > to need a consistent policy here.
> 
> wl?

The driver which started this discussion - Broadcom's proprietary driver
for their wireless chipsets. It's implemented much like NVIDIA, it's a
GPL-licensed wrapper around a binary blob with a
proprietary-but-can-be-redistributed license.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net