[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: emacs fan help with packaging .el
- From: "Jonathan Underwood" <jonathan underwood gmail com>
- To: "Tom Tromey" <tromey redhat com>, "Development discussions related to Fedora" <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: emacs fan help with packaging .el
- Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 19:12:18 +0000
2009/1/4 Tom Tromey <tromey redhat com>:
>>>>>> "Chitlesh" == Chitlesh GOORAH <chitlesh goorah gmail com> writes:
>
> Chitlesh> I have never used emacs before.
>
> It is never too late :-)
>
> Chitlesh> http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/dinotrace.spec
>
> I'm curious about the byte-compilation step in this spec file. Emacs
> .elc files are not portable across Emacs versions; so won't this do
> the wrong thing depending on the emacs alternatives setting? It seems
> to me that either Emacs or XEmacs users will be left out.
An emacs-foo subpackages target GNU Emacs specifically, so that's ok.
Chitlesh could also create an xemacs subpackage if he chooses to.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]