TeX font package naming guidelines

[Nicolas Mailhot]

Le mercredi 14 janvier 2009 à 14:02 -0300, Horst H. von Brand a écrit :
> Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> > ctan-some-package-fonts-common
> > ctan-some-package-roman-fonts
> > 
> > according to the draft for the fonts part.
> 
> Sounds wrong... either all fonts-foo or all bar-fonts, not mix and
> match. Please?

The -fonts packages are real font packages
The srpm-common is an utility package with no fonts inside (common stuff
like directory ownership, documentation, etc), so it's actually good it
has a different naming than packages with fonts in them.

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29
-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090114/5e13969c/attachment.sig>