Re: Heads up openssl-0.9.8j in rawhide

[Bill Nottingham <notting redhat com>]

Tomas Mraz (tmraz redhat com) said: 
> > - a compatiblity openssl098g package?
> I do not see a real need for such package except the third party
> software support. We do not do compatibility packages for many other
> important libraries either. But if anyone wants to maintain it feel free
> to submit it for review and cc-me on the bugzilla entry, I will happily
> review it.

I'm just wondering if it's worth it even just as a crutch-to-keep-rawhide
-functional in cases like these. Aside from that, I guess the only other
reason to have it is for software built on F9/F10. There's certainly some
of that, but I don't know how much.

Bill