[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Draft: simple update description guidelines
- From: "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones redhat com>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Draft: simple update description guidelines
- Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:43:53 +0000
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 11:48:45PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> * All Updates must refer to a upstream changelog or equivalent if one
> exists. Otherwise a brief description (a couple of sentence at most)
> justifying the need for an update must be provided by the maintainers
> pushing the update.
I'm happy this applies only to released versions of Fedora[1]. But I
think this should also exclude 'newpackage' updates explicitly (ie.
where a new package is added to a released version of Fedora).
Rich.
[1] Although it will certainly mean I feel much less inclined to just
upgrade any released packages unless there's a security issue.
--
Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a
live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into Xen guests.
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-p2v
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]