[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: what requires fedora-release-notes



On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 11:05:41AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 13:50 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:03:06AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 19:02 +0100, Daniel Mach wrote:
> > > >  
> > > > Jesse, is there any important data in this package which needs to be 
> > > > shipped in Fedora at any cost?
> > > > I can imagine some legal or licensing information about Fedora.
> > > 
> > > I don't believe so.
> > 
> > The arguable value of the "About Fedora" item -- which as some Desktop
> > team members have noted, probably needs to be revamped -- is certainly
> > not enough to keep it.  It would be prudent and probably good manners
> > to alert the Docs team about contemplating dropping this, too.
> 
> Well, we would make it a default install item via groupings, but perhaps
> not /forced/ install, so that one could remove it/opt out of installing
> it should they wish.

Thanks for clarifying this.

-- 
Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug

Attachment: pgpdfNR4RqOvj.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]