[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: what requires fedora-release-notes



thnx. folks,

I have filed two bugs:

1. don't require fedora-release-notes in fedora-release
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483018

2. install fedora-release-notes vie "base" group
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483019

On Wednesday 28 January 2009 11:24:04 pm Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 11:05:41AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 13:50 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:03:06AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 19:02 +0100, Daniel Mach wrote:
> > > > > Jesse, is there any important data in this package which needs to
> > > > > be shipped in Fedora at any cost?
> > > > > I can imagine some legal or licensing information about Fedora.
> > > >
> > > > I don't believe so.
> > >
> > > The arguable value of the "About Fedora" item -- which as some Desktop
> > > team members have noted, probably needs to be revamped -- is certainly
> > > not enough to keep it.  It would be prudent and probably good manners
> > > to alert the Docs team about contemplating dropping this, too.
> >
> > Well, we would make it a default install item via groupings, but perhaps
> > not /forced/ install, so that one could remove it/opt out of installing
> > it should they wish.
>
> Thanks for clarifying this.



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]