[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009
- From: Behdad Esfahbod <behdad behdad org>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 06:48:22 -0500
Robert Scheck wrote:
> You are not blocking them, if you do nothing. But you would block them, if
> you would refuse suggestions or pointings to the Guidelines. There were
> (are?) reviews, where a patch and/or a full formal review has been done,
> but the maintainer never has shown up or just told "no, I won't do that, I
> am upstream". That is blocking and/or refusing. I mentioned examples for
> exactly such cases in my previous e-mails and Paul is also aware of them
> (at least he was, when I told him that 6 months ago).
Well, that just makes no sense. In those cases you should follow up with
Fedora leadership to resolve it. All I'm asking you is to NOT extend that to
all "RH guys" (that expression is sexist btw).
behdad
- References:
- Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009
- Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009
- Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009
- Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009
- Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009
- Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009
- Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009
- Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009
- Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009
- Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009
- Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]