[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009
- From: Jesse Keating <jkeating redhat com>
- To: fedora-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 08:15:38 -0800
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 11:58 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> For example I just found out that one of the people I sponsor is proven
> packager. Of course I do trust him, otherwise I would not have sponsored
> him, but I doubt that 2 packages (!) and 3 months of experience are
> enough for a proven packager.
>
> This shows that Jesse's proposal is pretty much useless, because it is
> weaker then the previous set of rules, no matter if it was 5 or 8
> packages.
My proposal is to seed provenpackager with people who are /sponsors/.
It has absolutely nothing to do with how many packages you have. How is
this weaker? How would my suggested seeding lead to your people being
in provenpackager?
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- References:
- Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009
- Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009
- Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009
- Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009
- Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009
- Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009
- Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009
- Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009
- Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009
- Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]