Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009

[Christoph Wickert <christoph wickert googlemail com>]

Am Donnerstag, den 29.01.2009, 20:32 +0200 schrieb Ville Skyttä:
> On Thursday 29 January 2009, David Tardon wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:40:43AM +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> > > Do RH employes have sponsors too? A lot of the bad reviews are done by
> > > RH people and a lot of bad specs come from RH folks. Somebody pointed me
> > > to:
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433678
> > > and I had a quick glance over it before Andreas added his comments:
> > >       * no list of tests that have been run
> > >       * SourceURL is missing
> >
> > What about fixing rpmlint to check for missing tags? Just now it simply
> > ignores them,
> 
> $ grep "^'no-.*-tag'" /usr/share/rpmlint/TagsCheck.py
> 'no-packager-tag',
> 'no-version-tag',
> 'no-release-tag',
> 'no-name-tag',
> 'no-summary-tag',
> 'no-description-tag',
> 'no-group-tag',
> 'no-changelogname-tag',
> 'no-epoch-tag',
> 'no-url-tag',

Could you make it also check for
a) empty %doc statement as in xfce4-settings
b) duplicate tags as the duplicate description in ricci?

TIA,
Christoph