http://www.fsf.org/news/dont-depend-on-mono
Kevin Kofler
kevin.kofler at chello.at
Tue Jul 7 23:42:29 UTC 2009
Bill McGonigle wrote:
> With being tied up with ECMA and the various well-publicized efforts to
> get RAND licenses on them, these aren't the parts most people were
> worried about.
But the thing is, RAND does not necessarily mean royalty-free, let alone
compatible with Free Software licenses (no royalty-based patent license is,
and even royalty-free ones can have problematic restrictions). RAND just
means they won't charge you more just because you like Fedora and hate M$,
but it doesn't preclude them from charging a fee from every licensor (which
is inherently incompatible with Free Software: while Free Software is about
freedom, not cost, having to pay a patent holder for a license is NOT
considered Free).
Kevin Kofler
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list