an update to automake-1.11?

[Sam Varshavchik]

Kevin Kofler writes:

> Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>> That's great, and if this discussion was about cmake, then this would be a
>> valid point. But, this thread is not about cmake.
> 
> That CMake has this feature implies that the autotools suck for not having 
> it and forcing you to patch the configure script for your usecase.

Indeed. Here's an idea -- why don't you mass mail the maintainers of all the 
autotools-using projects you can find on Sourceforge, and be sure to tell 
them how much autotools suck, and how better CMake is. I'm sure they will 
appreciate your helpful suggestions.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090707/8c658f83/attachment.sig>