epel-release in Fedora repos?

[Jason L Tibbitts III]

>>>>> "TM" == Till Maas <opensource at till.name> writes:

TM> Imho if the devel branch is a problem, then it should not be
TM> created when the package is imported to CVS, if it is a epel-only
TM> package.

The devel branch is mandatory, but that doesn't mean that the package
owner has to import anything there if they don't need it.

Honestly, though, packages that will be in EPEL but not in Fedora at
all are very rare exceptions and retooling the infrastructure to
handle them specially would be something of a waste of effort.

 - J<