[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Rawhide mock builds broken
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs math uh edu>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Rawhide mock builds broken
- Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:41:06 -0500
>>>>> "JK" == Jesse Keating <jkeating redhat com> writes:
JK> Hrm, so I wonder about this. Does exim rely on the group ownership
JK> at all for anything? Would it make sense to have a general
JK> 'service' or 'nobody' group that these things could be tossed in if
JK> the group isn't to be used, to avoid taking dynamic GIDs on the
JK> host?
It just so happens that I actually use Exim (on mail servers, ssmtp on
everything else), and it does use group memberships for various things.
It also happens that in F-11 it also somehow got GID 93 for itself in
addition to the UID 93 that it requests. So useradd must have changed
its behavior quite recently.
JK> Or should we say that if you are going to take a specific UID, you
JK> need to take the GID to match it?
Past behavior of useradd seems to do that automatically (or at least it
tried).
I don't think it's bad for exim to groupadd 93 first, but honestly I
don't know what happens to existing installations that may have a
different GID set up and I don't want to break anything. I guess such
systems would be running rawhide and this is a bug fix, so....
- J<
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]