[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Agenda for the 2009-05-26 Packaging Committee meeting
- From: "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones redhat com>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Agenda for the 2009-05-26 Packaging Committee meeting
- Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 13:13:19 +0100
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 12:53:07PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> Or consider "Recommends: B >= 1.2" - what exactly does this mean? The
> package does something "better" if B is installed too, but what if we
> only have B 1.0 installed/available. Does the package even work with B
> 1.0? If it doesn't work with B 1.0, should rpm emit an error in such a
> case? If the version doesn't match, should B be pulled in anyway?
As far as I can tell, in Debian a versioned suggestion is still just a
suggestion. If B = 1.0 were installed, it would be up to the package
A to detect this and do the right thing. But I agree this is a nasty
corner case which would need to be made explicit one way or another.
RIch.
--
Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any
software inside the virtual machine. Supports Linux and Windows.
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]