Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
Bill McGonigle
bill at bfccomputing.com
Tue Jun 16 00:26:54 UTC 2009
On 06/15/2009 03:34 PM, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> I wonder if a switch like that makes a difference for owners of "newer"
> CPUs. Aren't they/we already using x86-64, leaving i386 for old
> hardware and netbooks?
Many third-party vendors are just/still getting their stuff working on
64-bit, so, sadly, no. The poor saps who have to run non-free software,
especially.
But things are much better today than they were even just a year ago,
and these are future discussions. It seems likely that a year hence
everybody [for most values of 'every'] will be up to speed, which is
about when F11 will be EOL.
My brand new eeePC 1000he is only a 32-bit Atom, though, so as much as
I'd like to support old gear, I'd like it to be fast on my netbook too.
But I agree with the statisticians in the room who are calling for data.
One thing that might seem counter-intuitive is that people tune for old
hardware as well as new. I have a project on a Via C7 that I run a
gentoo-based distro on because I can tweak compilation for that
hardware, and I've seen 40% gains in some areas. On a Core2Quad, I run
Fedora and don't look back, as I have CPU to spare and haven't seen a
benefit in tuning for it.
-Bill
--
Bill McGonigle, Owner Work: 603.448.4440
BFC Computing, LLC Home: 603.448.1668
http://www.bfccomputing.com/ Cell: 603.252.2606
Twitter, etc.: bill_mcgonigle Page: 603.442.1833
Email, IM, VOIP: bill at bfccomputing.com
Blog: http://blog.bfccomputing.com/
VCard: http://bfccomputing.com/vcard/bill.vcf
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list