Heads up: NoArch Sub Packages Feature continues

[Seth Vidal]

On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, Kevin Kofler wrote:

> Seth Vidal wrote:
>> read that again? You would expect higher ver i386 to install over x86_64
>> ON an x86_64 box?
>
> I'd expect that too. There's certainly a reason why the current version is
> not available natively, if not, it's a bug in the repo.

Just to be clear - you're okay with writing things off as a bug in the 
repo but you're unhappy saying not obsoleteing the older pkg on an 
arch-change is a packaging bug?


I love it.

Either way it's bug reports for yum for edge cases.

woohoo.

-sv