[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: rawhide report: 20090619 changes
- From: Adam Williamson <awilliam redhat com>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20090619 changes
- Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 15:07:26 -0700
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 23:53 +0200, David Nielsen wrote:
>
>
> 2009/6/19 Peter Robinson <pbrobinson gmail com>
>
> mono-tools-2.4.2-1.fc12
> -----------------------
> * Tue Jun 09 2009 Paul F. Johnson
> <paul all-the-johnsons co uk> - 2.4.2-1
> - Bump to 2.4.2 preview 1
> - Add support for ppc and ppc64
>
> - Add label for udev-acl
>
>
>
> is there any reason why mono doesn't use the 0.x revision tags
> for alpha/beta/RC releases like everyone else?
>
> Plenty of projects fall outside that naming scheme, it's unfortunate
> but that is life. Maybe upstream will consider your thoughts on the
> matter if you bring them to their attention.
He's not talking about upstream, he's talking about the Fedora package
release tag. There is a policy for the handling of pre-releases in the
release tag:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]