what requires fedora-release-notes

Peter Vrabec pvrabec at redhat.com
Thu Mar 5 17:12:59 UTC 2009


Jesse could you fix #483018 please.

On Thursday 29 January 2009 12:19:43 pm Peter Vrabec wrote:
> thnx. folks,
>
> I have filed two bugs:
>
> 1. don't require fedora-release-notes in fedora-release
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483018
>
> 2. install fedora-release-notes vie "base" group
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483019
>
> On Wednesday 28 January 2009 11:24:04 pm Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 11:05:41AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 13:50 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:03:06AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 19:02 +0100, Daniel Mach wrote:
> > > > > > Jesse, is there any important data in this package which needs to
> > > > > > be shipped in Fedora at any cost?
> > > > > > I can imagine some legal or licensing information about Fedora.
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't believe so.
> > > >
> > > > The arguable value of the "About Fedora" item -- which as some
> > > > Desktop team members have noted, probably needs to be revamped -- is
> > > > certainly not enough to keep it.  It would be prudent and probably
> > > > good manners to alert the Docs team about contemplating dropping
> > > > this, too.
> > >
> > > Well, we would make it a default install item via groupings, but
> > > perhaps not /forced/ install, so that one could remove it/opt out of
> > > installing it should they wish.
> >
> > Thanks for clarifying this.





More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list