Please fix your bugs in release instead of rawhide!
Daniel P. Berrange
berrange at redhat.com
Tue Mar 10 19:10:49 UTC 2009
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:57:10AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 14:24 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> > Chuck Anderson wrote:
> > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html
> > >
> > > How did you find that? I was looking for it, but couldn't find it
> > > linked from anywhere.
> >
> > It's linked, at least, in the word "Status" at the bottom of each bug,
> > next to the drop-down where you would set the status.
[snip]
> Possibly the clearest thing to do would just be to use the same flow
> RHEL uses, even if the names would be a bit odd for Fedora (since we
> don't really have 'Errata' for Fedora releases). Otherwise, the Fedora
> flow should at least be clearly defined somewhere, and explained on that
> page in Bugzilla.
The Fedora bug flow is defined here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow
Although it is lacking clear guidelines on the choice of sub-state for
the CLOSED state. That just requires a little docs work on the wiki.
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list