Please fix your bugs in release instead of rawhide!

Daniel P. Berrange berrange at redhat.com
Tue Mar 10 19:10:49 UTC 2009


On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:57:10AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 14:24 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> > Chuck Anderson wrote:
> > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html
> > >
> > > How did you find that?  I was looking for it, but couldn't find it
> > > linked from anywhere.
> > 
> > It's linked, at least, in the word "Status" at the bottom of each bug,
> > next to the drop-down where you would set the status.

[snip]

> Possibly the clearest thing to do would just be to use the same flow
> RHEL uses, even if the names would be a bit odd for Fedora (since we
> don't really have 'Errata' for Fedora releases). Otherwise, the Fedora
> flow should at least be clearly defined somewhere, and explained on that
> page in Bugzilla.

The Fedora bug flow is defined here:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow

Although it is lacking clear guidelines on the choice of sub-state for
the CLOSED state. That just requires a little docs work on the wiki.


Daniel
-- 
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London   -o-   http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org  -o-  http://virt-manager.org  -o-  http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505  -o-  F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list