Please fix your bugs in release instead of rawhide!

[Brennan Ashton]

On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Tom Lane <tgl at redhat.com> wrote:
> "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange at redhat.com> writes:
>> The Fedora bug flow is defined here:
>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow
>
>> Although it is lacking clear guidelines on the choice of sub-state for
>> the CLOSED state. That just requires a little docs work on the wiki.
>
> Well, the choice of sub-state is exactly what's being debated here.
> I think it's more than a "missing docs" problem, since (1) it's not
> clear that we have a consensus, and (2) bodhi doesn't read docs.
> Whatever we settle on will have to be implemented in bodhi.
>
> Another thing that would be nice is to get bugzilla to show a link
> to this page instead of the RHEL one when looking at a Fedora bug.
>
> BTW, I notice that this diagram seems to treat NEEDINFO as an
> independent state, which is no longer true --- it's just a flag now.
>
>                        regards, tom lane

Tom,
There should be a new version soon, it was brought up in IRC a while
ago, and the task was assigned today in the Bugzappers meeting.