[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Experience and observations of F11a/rawhide so far
- From: Adam Williamson <awilliam redhat com>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Experience and observations of F11a/rawhide so far
- Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 15:24:07 -0700
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 17:14 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 12:05 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > It also won't be an issue when updating from F10 to F11, as long as you
> > update F10 first (a compatible rpm was shipped as an F10 update). It'll
> > also be OK from Beta onwards, as you say. Only Alpha -> 11 or
> > non-updated 10 -> 11 via yum will be affected.
>
> Has this updated rpm for F10 already been pushed? Cause I am sure I
> tried an F10 to rawhide (as of couple days ago) update via yum and i got
> those same md5/checksum errors as well.
>From the discussion on this list, yes, it's supposed to have been
released already. Was it a *fully up to date* F10 that you tried to
upgrade?
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]