Re: libsyncml

[Adam Williamson <awilliam redhat com>]

On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 14:15 -0700, Alex Lancaster wrote:

> AW> So Andreas is happy for this to be proposed to get into F11 at this
> AW> point. Echoing Nathan's question - where does this get taken next?
> 
> I suggest opening up bug on libopensync, add the patches against the
> current spec file(s) that fix the API, bump Epoch tag and do any the
> required Obsoletes/Provides.  Has Andreas already provided the
> necessary modifications to the spec files that would do all this?

Yes, as I said, the packages in that testing location I linked to
earlier in the thread already do the obsoleting correctly, I've tested
this. SRPMs are in there, it's not just binary packages.

> Then post the link to the bug here and request people in the
> provenpackager group to apply the patches, do the rebuilds and request
> rel-eng tagging (assuming they get done in time for the f11-beta).
> Since Andreas has already given the node for rebuilds to be done in
> his absence, this should be OK.

Here's the link again:

http://fedora.lowlatency.de/opensync-synce/SRPMS/

of course, if Andreas is only going to indisposed for a few days, we
could just wait for him. Jesse tells me he can still just push a build
as normal and it'll get into Rawhide for F11 as soon as the beta's done.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net