[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Abandon "Default Desktop"



Toshio Kuratomi wrote:


<Snip>
......
</Snip

Jesse isn't saying that having Firefox is the deciding factor for the
question of whether it should be the default.  The choice of name is
bikeshedable (It's really the Red Hat Desktop Team's vision at the
moment; your points about how many different choices than upstream made
makes it no longer GNOME) but the name is separate from the issue of it
being the default live image.

Interesting..

So does a *DE SIG that emerges have to follow upstream to the letter
to be allowed to be called Fedora-<insert DE name here>?

Can a Gnome SIG be created to act as Gnome representatives within the Fedora project and it's spin thus gets named Fedora-Gnome which may or may not differ from the current desktop spin?

What are the criteria that other DE's need to meet to be allowed to be the "default" or "Fedora-Desktop"?

Which begs another question how do we handle if more then one DE can and will meet that criteria?

JBG
begin:vcard
fn:Johann B. Gudmundsson
n:Gudmundsson;Johann B.
org:Reiknistofnun - University of Iceland;IT Management
adr:Taeknigardi;;Dunhagi 5;Reykjavik;;107;Iceland
email;internet:johannbg hi is
title:Unix System Engineer RHCE,CCSA
tel;work:+3545254267
tel;fax:+3545528801
tel;pager:N/A
tel;home:N/A
tel;cell:N/A
url:www.rhi.hi.is
version:2.1
end:vcard


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]