[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: best practices for updates in stable releases (was: Re: OpenOffice 3.1)
- From: Matej Cepl <mcepl redhat com>
- To: fedora-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: best practices for updates in stable releases (was: Re: OpenOffice 3.1)
- Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 17:26:31 +0200
On 2009-05-11, 15:49 GMT, Jud Craft wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Jesse Keating <jkeating redhat com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 13:03 +0200, Matej Cepl wrote:
>> Suggestions on how to "enforce" ?
>
> Lock out developers who don't follow guidelines? Sanction them?
> Remove their ability to push updates?
>
> No sass meant, I just figured that was a strange rhetorical question.
> Does Fedora really not have any ability to enforce its own guidelines?
Yeah, some of these ... for the really big cock ups suspending of
packager's rights for some time. After all, it is not an
universal human right to be able to push to Fedora CVS. Getting
out of provenpackager group for less outrageous offenses.
Why not?
Matěj
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]