[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: gnaughty is a hot babe
- From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer gmail com>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: gnaughty is a hot babe
- Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 07:28:15 -0400
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:30:45PM +0300, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
>> IMHO it is not Fedora's job to define family values & moralities. Such morals/values will vary all around the world
>I don't want fedora to define such things, we have our own values predefined.
>
>it should not make my job finding suck packages difficult
>we have more than 10,000 packages in the repos so don't expect me to
>test them all
>
>the package maintainers already classify their packages using Group:
>in the spec file
>
>and they already classify them in yum comps files
>
>I demand a systematic way, a policy that tells a package maintainer
>how to categories their packages in a unified proper way to warn
>people like us from their packages.
You can demand whatever you want, but that doesn't mean you will get it. If
you want that, draft a proposal for the packaging guidelines and submit it.
Honestly, I agree with the view that it is not Fedora's place to classify
packages in such a manner.
josh
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]