gnaughty is a hot babe

[Florian Festi]

inode0 wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Kushal Das <kushaldas at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 6:16 PM, inode0 <inode0 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> True. Someone should ask the question: does it make sense to have
>>> different rules if they prevent the inclusion of useful content and
>>> allow the inclusion of useless code?
>> Which is useless to me can be very useful to someone else.
> 
> That doesn't explain why there is a different standard for content.

It is ok if you know and obey the rules. There is no need for you to 
understand why they are in place. Anyway, Fedora is a Linux distribution 
(for those who did not yet realize) an though (free) Linux software (that 
can be run on Fedora) is what it is all about and content is not (with very 
few exceptions). Software yes - content no. I really see no way or reason 
why there should be a common standard for both.

Florian