[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: gnaughty is a hot babe
- From: Bill Nottingham <notting redhat com>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: gnaughty is a hot babe
- Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 10:34:12 -0400
Dennis J. (dennisml conversis de) said:
>> I wrote a proposal
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/InappropriateContents
>
> I don't think you can just flag Packages as inappropriate because
> everyone has his own definition for that term. If you really want to make
> this work you'll have to create specific classifications like "nudity" or
> "violence" so people can make informed decisions. People might be ok with
> violent content but not nudity. When I see a Package marked only as
> "inappropriate" that doesn't help me to tell whether *I* would find that
> inappropriate or not.
At which point, you need some sort of review board, where then every
package gets something like:
- TuxPaint is rated E for Everyone
- quake3 is rated T for violent content
- tcl is rated M for inappropriate language
I'm going to go out on a limb and claim we don't have the resources to
coherently do this.
Bill
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]