conflict between seedit <-> selinux-policy and qstat <-> torque-client

Rudolf Kastl che666 at gmail.com
Wed Nov 4 15:33:42 UTC 2009


2009/11/4 Steve Traylen <steve.traylen at cern.ch>:
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Rudolf Kastl <che666 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2009/11/4 Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs at math.uh.edu>:
>>>>>>>> "ST" == Steve Traylen <steve.traylen at cern.ch> writes:
>>>
>>> ST> Would be happy for an alternatives solution. I have yet another
>>> ST> /usr/bin/qstat for a POSIX interface to batch on the way at some
>>> ST> point.
>>>
>>> Turns out that the other queuing systems (torque and gridengine) have
>>> already renamed their qstat binaries (to qstat-torque and qstat-ge).  I
>>> would expect that other queuing packages should do the same.
>>
> Yes a qstat-slurm with qstat as alternative across them.
> Good news.

but then the alternatives qstat  conflicts with /usr/bin/qstat from
the qstat rpm package, doesent it?

kind regards,
Rudolf Kastl

>
>> that means that the conflict tags in the qemu and the torque-clients
>> package are invalid.
>>
>> thanks for checking jason!
>>
>> kind regards,
>> Rudolf Kastl
>>>
>>>  - J<
>>>
>>> --
>>> fedora-devel-list mailing list
>>> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>>>
>>
>> --
>> fedora-devel-list mailing list
>> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Steve Traylen
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list