source file audit - 2009-11-01

[Mat Booth]

2009/11/5 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at scrye.com>:
> On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 20:57:42 -0600
> Bruno Wolff III <bruno at wolff.to> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 17:18:16 -0700,
>>   Kevin Fenzi <kevin at scrye.com> wrote:
>> > Here's attached another run of my sources/patches url checker.
>> >
>> > bruno:BADURL:glest_data_3.2.1.zip:glest-data
>>
>> I took over glest recently and hadn't had to worry about where the
>> sources had come from yet. The next time I make a change I'll be sure
>> to make sure that the source URLs are accurate.
>
> Excellent. Thanks.
>
>> P.S.
>> If the audiance for this report is developers, I think it would make
>> more sense to sort on the FAS name and then on package name.
>
> ok. I think I did do that in the past, but failed this time. ;(
>
> kevin
>

Don't worry, my mail reader has a magical search function I can use to
look for my FAS name. ;-)

The packages of mine in that list I will look at this weekend.


-- 
Mat Booth

A: Because it destroys the order of the conversation.
Q: Why shouldn't you do it?
A: Posting your reply above the original message.
Q: What is top-posting?