cpio to ext4 seems much slower than to ext2, ext3 or xfs
Richard W.M. Jones
rjones at redhat.com
Wed Nov 11 21:05:20 UTC 2009
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 01:24:20PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Anybody got actual numbers? I don't disagree that mkfs.ext4 is slow in
> the default config, but I don't think it should be slower than mkfs.ext3
> for the same sized disks.
Easy with guestfish:
$ guestfish --version
guestfish 1.0.78
$ for fs in ext2 ext3 ext4 xfs jfs ; do guestfish sparse /tmp/test.img 10G : run : echo $fs : sfdiskM /dev/sda , : time mkfs $fs /dev/sda1 ; done
ext2
elapsed time: 5.21 seconds
ext3
elapsed time: 7.87 seconds
ext4
elapsed time: 6.10 seconds
xfs
elapsed time: 0.45 seconds
jfs
elapsed time: 0.78 seconds
Note that because this is using a sparsely allocated disk each write
to the virtual disk is very slow. Change 'sparse' to 'alloc' to test
this with a non-sparse file-backed disk.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a
live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into Xen guests.
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-p2v
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list