A silly question about our "FC" tag

[Adam Williamson]

On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 04:48 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 11/19/2009 04:31 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 22:37 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >> If there were an automated sanity check somewhere as part of the pkg
> >> release procedure, that might help. It would enforce proper %release
> >> bumps.
> >>
> >>
> > 
> > That is coming with AutoQA and it will certainly be able to find
> > upgrade-path issues.
> 
> A lot of questions seem to be getting this answer but how close are we
> to AutoQA doing all this? Are we going to start running it and reporting
> bugs in Rawhide soon?

There's a weekly update on AutoQA in the QA group meetings, the
summaries and logs of which you can find linked here:

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings

I also summarize the weekly update in the QA section in every FWN issue.

I'm not working on autoqa myself, but we're actually already running
several autoqa tests - the results go to the autoqa-results mailing list
at present, https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/autoqa-results ,
until we have things in more 'final' form - and I would guess we will be
running tests of the kind discussed above, oh, during the F13 cycle.
Will could be more precise.

-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net