Re: clutter-cairomm is obsolete and should be retired

[Kevin Kofler <kevin kofler chello at>]

Denis Leroy wrote:
> was gone for the week-end. all done.

Uh, no, sorry, but you didn't do the retiring correctly:
* clutter-cairomm should be marked dead.package in both F-12 and devel. It 
is not marked dead.package in either, instead you marked cluttermm/devel as 
dead.package, which I can only assume was a mistake.
* cluttermm should get an "Obsoletes: clutter-cairomm < some-version" for 
upgrade paths, just like clutter now obsoletes clutter-cairo. And once you 
added that, you'll also need to get cluttermm tagged into f12-beta (or if 
you miss the beta, into f12-final).

        Kevin Kofler