Re: Bug reporting URL field in packages

["Nicolas Mailhot" <nicolas mailhot laposte net>]

Le Mar 6 octobre 2009 17:03, Tom \"spot\" Callaway a écrit :
>
> On 10/06/2009 10:37 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>> It is out of scope for this discussion though, the question here is
>> about the default value Fedora packages should have. The BUGURL tag
>> contents is just a plain old string which is expanded from %bugurl macro
>> at build time and currently no further processing is done on it.
>
> http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/%{name} would be ideal here, but we would
> need for %{name} to evaluate to the SRPM name, not the subpackage name.

BTW, this is a more general problem: currently rpm metadata does not reference
the %{name} of the srpm, but its filename, which is a PITA, since srpm
filename is not really useful nowadays (also IIRC you can rename a srpm to
anything.src.rpm and the result will build and reference anything.src.rpm as
srpm info)


-- 
Nicolas Mailhot