[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Howto handle multilib conflict?
- From: Neal Becker <ndbecker2 gmail com>
- To: fedora-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Howto handle multilib conflict?
- Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 07:10:06 -0400
I received the following from upstream. Anyone know the answer to the
question (how do freetype-config, etc workaround this issue?)
In article <200910092117 36851 ndbecker2 gmail com>, Neal Becker
<ndbecker2 gmail com> writes:
> I maintain libotf for Fedora.
Thank you very much for that work!
> We have received a bug report of a multilib
> conflict, which occurs when installing development packages for both i586
and
> x86_64. The problem is /usr/bin/libotf-config, which occurs in both
packages
> but is not identical.
> My solution is to remove this file. I'm hoping it's not really needed.
> libotf already has package-config support (which is multilib compatible
> already), so if all apps use package-config there should be no problem.
> Are there any apps that need /usr/bin/libotf-config to your knowledge?
As far as I know, there's none. So, it's ok to remove
libotf-config. But, why does libotf-config don't work with
multilib? How do the other XXX-config programs
(e.g. freetype-config, fribidi-config, gtk-config, ...) work
with multilib?
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]