tagging of non critical path package into F-12?

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Thu Oct 15 16:03:07 UTC 2009


On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 16:53 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Not according to Jesse, even in this thread there seems to be mixed
> communications. My understanding was from the last FUDCon would be
> that it would be complete lock down for core stuff with more
> flexibility for the stuff that obviously isn't mainline and going
> affect the core stability but then then I've not seen communication
> either way so I honestly would have no idea.
> 
> 

Thats true for most of the freeze, but when we hit release candidate
stage we change absolutely nothing.  The problem right now is that there
is only one repo to publish things into, rawhide, but we have multiple
things we'd like to publish; pending F12 Beta tree, pending F12 final
tree, and the F13 tree.  We have to pick one.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20091015/c045677e/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list