[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Simplify non-responsive maintainers policy Part 2



Lyos Gemini Norezel <lyos gemininorezel gmail com> writes:
> Why not just require a secondary email address?

"Require" a secondary email address?  Not everyone has one, or wants
to hand it over if they do.  That sounds more like a recipe for driving
maintainers away than making sure you can contact them.

			regards, tom lane


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]