[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Simplify non-responsive maintainers policy Part 2



On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 04:42:16PM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Oct 2009, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 09:43:46AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 11:16 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> > > > What kind of checks do you mean? If maintainers want to keep their
> > > > packages, they can just change the owner of the package to their new
> > > > private account before leaving Red Hat.
> > >
> > > That assumes the maintainer knows they're leaving Red Hat ahead of time.
> >
> > Perhaps no one should be using their @redhat.com address for Fedora
> > work :-/
> >
> 
> We generally discourage it but several still do it.

Err surely just the opposite. At least anyone who works on both RHEL and
Fedora will use their @redhat.com address because they need this to be
able to see private BZ comments & most people don't want to constantly
be switching between 2 BZ account logins just to use alternate addr for
Fedora.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London   -o-   http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org  -o-  http://virt-manager.org  -o-  http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505  -o-  F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]