Re: Simplify non-responsive maintainers policy Part 2

["Nicolas Mailhot" <nicolas mailhot laposte net>]

Le Jeu 22 octobre 2009 23:45, Adam Williamson a écrit :
>
> On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 16:42 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
>
>> > Perhaps no one should be using their @redhat.com address for Fedora
>> > work :-/
>>
>> We generally discourage it but several still do it.
>
> Uh, we do? No-one's ever indicated that to me. Why would it be
> discouraged? Doesn't RH like its contributions to Fedora to be clear?

The right solution is just to have some manager as fallback address. Telling
people to use a non-rh address when their Fedora activity is linked to their
@rh work is ridiculous.

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot