[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Simplify non-responsive maintainers policy Part 2





On Thu, 22 Oct 2009, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:

On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 04:42:16PM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009, Chuck Anderson wrote:

On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 09:43:46AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 11:16 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
What kind of checks do you mean? If maintainers want to keep their
packages, they can just change the owner of the package to their new
private account before leaving Red Hat.

That assumes the maintainer knows they're leaving Red Hat ahead of time.

Perhaps no one should be using their @redhat.com address for Fedora
work :-/


We generally discourage it but several still do it.

Err surely just the opposite. At least anyone who works on both RHEL and
Fedora will use their @redhat.com address because they need this to be
able to see private BZ comments & most people don't want to constantly
be switching between 2 BZ account logins just to use alternate addr for
Fedora.


I actually have both.

rhel bugs get assigned to svidal at redhat.com
fedora bugs go to skvidal at sethdot.org

-sv




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]