Simplify non-responsive maintainers policy Part 2

[Seth Vidal]

On Thu, 22 Oct 2009, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 04:42:16PM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
>> On Thu, 22 Oct 2009, Chuck Anderson wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 09:43:46AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 11:16 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
>>>>> What kind of checks do you mean? If maintainers want to keep their
>>>>> packages, they can just change the owner of the package to their new
>>>>> private account before leaving Red Hat.
>>>>
>>>> That assumes the maintainer knows they're leaving Red Hat ahead of time.
>>>
>>> Perhaps no one should be using their @redhat.com address for Fedora
>>> work :-/
>>>
>>
>> We generally discourage it but several still do it.
>
> Err surely just the opposite. At least anyone who works on both RHEL and
> Fedora will use their @redhat.com address because they need this to be
> able to see private BZ comments & most people don't want to constantly
> be switching between 2 BZ account logins just to use alternate addr for
> Fedora.
>

I actually have both.

rhel bugs get assigned to svidal at redhat.com
fedora bugs go to skvidal at sethdot.org

-sv