[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: rpms/python-mpd/F-10 python-mpd.spec,1.2,1.3 sources,1.2,1.3
- From: Christoph Wickert <christoph wickert googlemail com>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: rpms/python-mpd/F-10 python-mpd.spec,1.2,1.3 sources,1.2,1.3
- Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 22:20:59 +0100
Am Sonntag, den 25.10.2009, 20:56 +0100 schrieb Haïkel Guémar:
> This is personal policy to always push latest stable unless it's broken,
> since it wasn't critical, i had always delayed it.
> Why i pushed the update on older branches ? Maintainers are asked to
> support branches until EOL and it worked on my test VM.
> Maybe, i'm just a bit maniacal. ;)
Definitely. ;) To "support" does not mean to drown users in useless
updates. We had this discussions over and over again, please look for
the thread called "The updates firehose" back in June 2007.
> Did it break anything ? For the moment, updates are staging in testing,
> i can unpush them if you think it's more appropriate. :)
In this case I think you really should unpush it. Not only for F-11 but
for F-11 as well, possibly F12 to. If this update doesn't fix anything
on Linux, then don't push it.
> H.
Regards,
Christoph
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: rpms/python-mpd/F-10 python-mpd.spec,1.2,1.3 sources,1.2,1.3
- Re: rpms/python-mpd/F-10 python-mpd.spec,1.2,1.3 sources,1.2,1.3
- Re: rpms/python-mpd/F-10 python-mpd.spec,1.2,1.3 sources,1.2,1.3
- References:
- Re: rpms/python-mpd/F-10 python-mpd.spec,1.2,1.3 sources,1.2,1.3
- Re: rpms/python-mpd/F-10 python-mpd.spec,1.2,1.3 sources,1.2,1.3
- Re: rpms/python-mpd/F-10 python-mpd.spec,1.2,1.3 sources,1.2,1.3
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]