[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: rpms/python-mpd/F-10 python-mpd.spec,1.2,1.3 sources,1.2,1.3



On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 22:20:59 +0100, Christoph wrote:

> Am Sonntag, den 25.10.2009, 20:56 +0100 schrieb Haïkel Guémar:
> 
> > This is personal policy to always push latest stable unless it's broken,
> > since it wasn't critical, i had always delayed it.
> > Why i pushed the update on older branches ? Maintainers are asked to
> > support branches until EOL and it worked on my test VM.
> > Maybe, i'm just a bit maniacal. ;)
> 
> Definitely. ;) To "support" does not mean to drown users in useless
> updates. We had this discussions over and over again, please look for
> the thread called "The updates firehose" back in June 2007.
> 
> > Did it break anything ? For the moment, updates are staging in testing,
> > i can unpush them if you think it's more appropriate. :)
> 
> In this case I think you really should unpush it. Not only for F-11 but
> for F-11 as well, possibly F12 to. If this update doesn't fix anything
> on Linux, then don't push it.

And once again, the bodhi update requests for these updates don't try to
explain what changes come with these updates. They are only marked as "bug
fix" updates with no notes that give details.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]