Re: Simplify non-responsive maintainers policy Part 2

[Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho redhat com>]

Hi,

On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 22:00 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 26 Oct 2009, Adam Williamson wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 09:28 +0100, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> >> way to deal with this issue, the simplest solution would be to have a
> >> word with someone in HC and ask them to add to their standard list of
> >
> > Note for non-RH'ers: HC = Human Capital, what most places call Human
> > Resources.
> >
> > (personally I'm not sure which one sounds more like Soylent Green,
> > they're both pretty bad :>)
> 
> I'm pretty sure they are called People and Brand. Not Human Capital 
> anymore.
> 
> -sv
> 
Yes, thats true, but you know what I mean :-) Its the general principle
that I was trying to get across,

Steve.