[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: rpms/fence-agents/F-11 fence-agents.spec,1.13,1.14
- From: Michael Schwendt <mschwendt gmail com>
- To: fence-agents-owner fedoraproject org
- Cc: fedora-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: rpms/fence-agents/F-11 fence-agents.spec,1.13,1.14
- Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:50:35 +0100
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:37:28 +0100, Fabio wrote:
> >> I also considered a specific file Requires: /usr/bin/virsh, but policy
> >> suggests to avoid that for different reasons.
> >
> > Really? What policy is that? Programs in bin paths are covered by the
> > primary metadata. Such a dependency would be more accurate.
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_Dependencies
>
> I understand that files in bin paths are already covered by primary
> data, but the way it is formulated there, it sounds (to me) that there
> is still extra processing involved from the different depsolver.
You've misread that section. Most of it comments on file dependencies
_outside_ (!) /etc and bin paths. Those are the ones you ought to avoid,
as the depsolvers would need to download and parse additional metadata
archives.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]