[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: rpms/fence-agents/F-11 fence-agents.spec,1.13,1.14
- From: "Fabio M. Di Nitto" <fdinitto redhat com>
- To: Michael Schwendt <mschwendt gmail com>
- Cc: fedora-devel-list redhat com, fence-agents-owner fedoraproject org
- Subject: Re: rpms/fence-agents/F-11 fence-agents.spec,1.13,1.14
- Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:54:25 +0100
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:37:28 +0100, Fabio wrote:
>
>>>> I also considered a specific file Requires: /usr/bin/virsh, but policy
>>>> suggests to avoid that for different reasons.
>>> Really? What policy is that? Programs in bin paths are covered by the
>>> primary metadata. Such a dependency would be more accurate.
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_Dependencies
>>
>> I understand that files in bin paths are already covered by primary
>> data, but the way it is formulated there, it sounds (to me) that there
>> is still extra processing involved from the different depsolver.
>
> You've misread that section. Most of it comments on file dependencies
> _outside_ (!) /etc and bin paths. Those are the ones you ought to avoid,
> as the depsolvers would need to download and parse additional metadata
> archives.
Ok, thanks for the clarification.
Update spec files are on the way.
Fabio
- References:
- Re: rpms/fence-agents/F-11 fence-agents.spec,1.13,1.14
- Re: rpms/fence-agents/F-11 fence-agents.spec,1.13,1.14
- Re: rpms/fence-agents/F-11 fence-agents.spec,1.13,1.14
- Re: rpms/fence-agents/F-11 fence-agents.spec,1.13,1.14
- Re: rpms/fence-agents/F-11 fence-agents.spec,1.13,1.14
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]