[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: RFC: proposed macro deffinitions for F-13



On Tuesday 27 October 2009 01:16:46 pm Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 12:40 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > Id like to get some feedback on the patches that i'm proposing for F-13.
> > quite a few packages that need to deal with differences between
> > 32bit/64bit  or multilib arches have defines for the appropriate arches. 
> > sometimes incomplete since they don't include secondary arches.
> >
> > I wanted to get some feedback. and see if there are other cases we should
> > add.
> 
> +%multilib32 sparc sparcv8 sparcv9 sparcv9v ppc s390
> +%multilib64 x86_64 sparc64 sparc64v ppc64 s390x
> 
> Remind me what the asymmetry is for here?  Why is %{ix86} not in
> %{multilib32} ?
> 
> In general I'd kind of prefer to see headers modified to use gcc's
> predefines for __SIZEOF_LONG__ and friends instead, but I'll take what I
> can get.

it should be the attached patch.  the initial one was based on what gcc does 
in its spec.  it treats %{ix86} as  not being multilib. 

+%multilib32 %{ix86} %{sparc32} ppc s390
+%multilib64 x86_64 %{sparc64} ppc64 s390x

--- redhat-rpm-config-9.0.3-orig/macros	2009-10-27 10:18:01.000000000 -0500
+++ redhat-rpm-config-9.0.3/macros	2009-10-27 12:14:24.000000000 -0500
@@ -277,3 +277,7 @@
 %global __find_requires /bin/sh -c "%{?__filter_req_cmd}  %{__deploop R} %{?__filter_from_req}" \
 }
 
+#==============================================================================
+# Set up multilib arch definitions
+%multilib32 sparc sparcv8 sparcv9 sparcv9v ppc s390
+%multilib64 x86_64 sparc64 sparc64v ppc64 s390x

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]