[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [Fedora-packaging] Directory draft (was Re: Triggers just to avoid unowned directories?)
- From: "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <tcallawa redhat com>
- To: fedora-packaging redhat com, Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: [Fedora-packaging] Directory draft (was Re: Triggers just to avoid unowned directories?)
- Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 11:53:21 -0400
On 09/02/2009 11:47 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Michel Alexandre Salim (michael silvanus gmail com) said:
>>>> Multi-ownership seems *far* preferable to me than using triggers to
>>>> move files around, or moving a prelink-specific directory to the base
>>>> filesystem package.
>>>
>>> Then the guidelines should be fixed to create less confusion over the
>>> matter.
>>>
>> Another precedence is with bash-completion -- the consensus is for
>> packages that provide completion scripts to own /etc/bash_completion.d
>
> OK, I've written up the following, which should be more clear:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BillNottingham/DirectoryDraft
>
> Comments?
Seems sane to me.
~spot
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]